GST Council Did Not Discuss Compensation For States

GST COUNCIL COMPENSATION NOT DISCUSSED

During the 56th GST Council meeting (September 2025), several States including Kerala and Telangana raised concerns over revenue losses from the recent GST rate cuts.

Background

  • The GST Compensation Scheme (valid till June 2022) assured 14% annual growth in States’ revenue for 5 years post-GST rollout (2017).
  • With GST 2.0 rate cuts in 2025, many States fear further decline in tax revenues.
  • States argue they bear most expenditure but receive less share of revenues.
GST COUNCIL DID NOT DISCUSS COMPENSATION FOR STATES

Reduced Revenue Growth

  • The Centre promised 14% annual revenue growth after GST.
  • Actual growth seen: 7–8%, much below expectations.
  • Result: States face funding gaps for development projects.

Expenditure-Revenue Mismatch

  • As per 15th Finance Commission:
    • States’ share in total government spending: ~64%.
    • Centre’s share in total revenue: ~63–64%.
  • Hence, States spend more but earn less, leading to fiscal stress.

Cesses and Surcharges

  • Around 20% of Centre’s revenue comes from cesses/surcharges, which are not shared with States.
  • Actual tax devolution is around 30–32%, below the 41% recommended by the Finance Commission.

Lack of Consultation and Transparency

  • Kerala’s Finance Minister said no detailed study or rate rationalisation report was shared before the rate cuts.
  • Decision was mainly based on Union Government’s proposal, not a joint analysis.

Absence of Discussion on Compensation

  • States had requested a compensation mechanism to offset revenue loss.
  • Though listed in the agenda, the topic was not discussed during the meeting.

Impact on States

  • Kerala estimates a loss of ₹8,000–₹10,000 crore.
  • Similar losses expected in other States due to tax reductions.
  • Increased financial dependence on the Centre may weaken fiscal federalism.

Way Forward

  • Revisit GST compensation framework post-rate cuts.
  • Limit cesses and surcharges to ensure fair revenue sharing.
  • Institutionalise consultative mechanisms in GST Council decisions.
  • Strengthen States’ fiscal autonomy for balanced development.

Conclusion

The absence of a clear compensation plan amid GST 2.0 reforms has reignited debate over Centre-State fiscal relations. For true cooperative federalism, States’ revenue needs must be addressed alongside tax simplification goals.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *