Allahabad High Court Judge Justice Yashwant Varma has moved the Supreme Court challenging the validity of the in-house inquiry mechanism that recommended his removal over unaccounted cash found at his residence. He argued that the SC’s action bypasses Parliament’s constitutional role in the removal of judges.
Background of the Case
- A fire incident occurred at Justice Varma’s official residence in March 2025.
- Later, cash was reportedly discovered in a storeroom damaged in the blaze.
- An internal committee of three judges, set up by the then Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna, submitted a report in May 2025 recommending his removal.
Justice Varma’s Objections
- He has called the inquiry an “extra-constitutional parallel system” created by the judiciary.
- He claims it violates Article 124 and Article 218 of the Constitution, which give Parliament the sole power to remove judges.
- The petition argues that the in-house mechanism lacks legal backing and is not part of any law passed by Parliament.
Concerns Raised
- Justice Varma alleges he was not granted a personal hearing or given access to properly defend himself.
- The inquiry was based on assumptions, without a formal complaint, seizure of cash, or any official record.
- He believes this process threatens both the independence of the judiciary and the principle of separation of powers.
Conclusion:
This case has raised serious constitutional questions about judicial accountability and the limits of the Supreme Court’s internal procedures.
