Machine-Readable Electoral Rolls

Congress leader Rahul Gandhi has demanded that the Election Commission (EC) provide “machine-readable” voter rolls to political parties. The issue has gained attention after allegations of duplicate entries and vote theft in certain constituencies.

What are Electoral Rolls?

  • Electoral rolls are the official lists of eligible voters in India.
  • They are updated regularly when:
    • New voters register,
    • People shift residence, or
    • Voters become ineligible (death, disqualification, etc.).
  • Prepared under EC supervision by district-level officials using the ERONET (Electoral Roll Management System).

Present Format of Voter Rolls

  • Shared as image PDF files or printouts.
  • These image PDFs contain names but are not searchable by computer systems.
  • Photos of voters are included in the database but not in public PDFs.
  • With nearly 99 crore voters, detecting duplicates is highly resource-intensive.

What are Machine-Readable Rolls?

  • Text-based PDFs or data files where entries can be indexed and searched using computers.
  • Enable quick identification of duplicate entries, irregular additions, or fake voters.
  • Earlier, activists like P.G. Bhat analysed such files to highlight irregularities.

Why EC Stopped Sharing Machine-Readable Rolls

  • In 2018, just before the 2019 elections, EC directed States to stop uploading them.
  • Reason: fear that foreign entities could misuse voter data (full names and addresses).
  • Supreme Court in Kamal Nath vs. EC (2018) refused to compel EC to provide such data, though EC’s own manual mentions draft rolls should be in text format.

Technical Challenges

  • Opposition suggests converting current PDFs into text using Optical Character Recognition (OCR).
  • However, difficulties include:
    • Rolls are divided into hundreds of parts per constituency.
    • Processing all (over 6 crore pages nationwide) is extremely costly (~$40,000 per update).

Arguments For & Against

  • For: Easier detection of duplicates and fraud. Improves transparency and trust in elections.
  • Against: Risks of data misuse, privacy breaches. High resource and financial costs for digitisation.

Way Forward

  • Balance between transparency and privacy.
  • Explore controlled access to machine-readable rolls for recognised parties.
  • Develop secure platforms to prevent misuse while enabling fraud detection.

Conclusion:

The issue of machine-readable electoral rolls reflects the need to balance transparency with voter privacy. Ensuring secure and regulated access can strengthen both electoral integrity and public trust.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *